To be honest when I read this I was shocked that they even had this training to begin with. I figured they were already PC enough under Obama not to have this type of training.
Read all about this at The Blaze

This probably has alot to do with why we have not seem an attack in New York since 9/11. Other cities should adopt the New York model. Read it all from Daniel Pipes:

U.S. law enforcement agencies have generally responded to 9/11 with a pretend counterterrorism policy. They still insist that naming the enemy as Islamism causes terrorism, that Islamist violence poses no more threat than that of neo-Nazis, racial supremacists, et al., and that counterterrorism primarily involves feel-good measures such as improving civil rights, passing anti-discrimination laws, and displaying goodwill to Islamists.

And then there is the New York Police Department, an institution uniquely spurred by 9/11 to abandon its former laxity and get serious. The force that had mishandled prior terrorist incidents (e.g., the assassination of Meir Kahane) quickly transformed itself into an outstanding counterterrorist agency under the remarkable leadership of Raymond Kelly. (Andrew McCarthy calls him a "godsend"). Unlike other law enforcement institutions, NYPD names the enemy, acknowledges the predominant threat of Islamist violence, and built a robust intelligence operation.

The public saw first hints of these changes in 2006, in the course of the Shahawar Matin Siraj trial. The government convicted Siraj, an illegal Pakistani immigrant planning to blow up a subway station, on the basis of information from two NYPD Muslim spies: a paid police informant, Osama Eldawoody, and a pseudonymous undercover detective, "Kamil Pasha." The latter testified about his serving as a "walking camera" among Muslims living in Brooklyn, to "observe, be the ears and eyes" for the NYPD.

Christopher Dickey provided the fullest picture of the department's achievements in a 2009 book, Securing the City: Inside America's Best Counterterror Force--The NYPD. Now, just in time for the 10th anniversary of 9/11, the Associated Press published a series of breathless investigations by Adam Goldman on the department's methods, focusing on NYPD cooperation with the Central Intelligence Agency, thereby bringing the department under intense political scrutiny.

Goldman reports that the department dispatched officers to Pakistani neighborhoods and "instructed them to look for reasons to stop cars: speeding, broken tail lights, running stop signs, whatever. The traffic stop gave police an opportunity to search for outstanding warrants or look for suspicious behavior. An arrest could be the leverage the police needed to persuade someone to become an informant." NYPD established the Terrorist Interdiction Unit to handle these informants, including "mosque crawlers," "café crawlers," shopkeepers, and nosy neighbors.

READ IT ALL

Atlas as all the details.
Fort Hood Jihad II: Muslim Servicemen Arrested in Alleged Attack on Fort Hood, Captured with possession of large quantities of ammunition, weapons and the explosive makings of a bomb

There is alot of debate going on right if Anders Behring Breivik was indeed a Christian terrorist. Many have also compared him with Islamic jihadist. Most of been on the left that have made this comparison. Even on the right Michael Savage has made this comparison. Lets take a look at the facts of who Breivik was. We can find this out by taking a look at his manifesto he wrote entitled 2083: A European Declaration Of Independence. The single point I have yet to see anyone hardly make is what Andres says on page 1307 of his manifesto.

"If you have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ and God then you are a religious Christian. Myself and many more like me do not necessarily have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ and God. We do however believe in Christianity as a cultural, social,identity and moral platform. This makes us Christian."

For me the fact he admits he does not have a personal relationship with Christ shows it is not a Christian. This is a basic fundamental of Christianity.

According to Andres his defintion of a Christian on page 1361 is:

"you believe in and want to protect Europe’s Christian cultural heritage."

Just because you want to defend Christian culture does not make one a Christian. Im not aware of any Christian that I know that would agree that believes that would make one a Christian. Claiming your a Christian and not accepting Jesus as your Savior would be comparable to a Muslim that does not believe that allah is the one true god and that Muhammad was allahs prophet. It just simply does not work.

Secondly some have said that he quoted Bible in his manifesto therefore he just like the jihadist who quote the Quran. While he does quote the Bible. As far as I can tell he does not quote it in order to justify the killing of children at the camp. Even if he did try to quote the Bible to justify his actions it would be quoted widly out of context. There is no Christian school of thought that would justify his attack. On the other side you have Muslim leaders and Muslim scholars more than willing to use the Quran to justify terrorist attacks.

I could go on about this but I wont. The bottom line is if you look at the example of Jesus who is the example that Christians are to follow and emulate He said: "But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;" (Matthew 5:44)

Then you compare that to the example of Muhammad who is the the ultimate example for Muslims to follow. (Quran 33:21) Here is what allah told Muhammad to write in the Quran about unbelievers: "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued." (Quran 9:29)

From Jihad Watch:

WASHINGTON (AP) _ The chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee says more than 40 Americans have been recruited by al-Qaida-linked terrorists in Somalia and have gone there to fight.

U.S. counterterrorism officials have not reported such high numbers of Americans joining the Somali terror organization, al-Shabab. The government has said at least 21 Somali-Americans are believed to have traveled to Somalia to join the terror group in what began as a push to expel Ethiopian soldiers. Al-Shabab claimed responsibility for the double suicide bomb attack in Uganda's capital last year, and members have aligned themselves with other anti-Western terror groups.

New York Republican Rep. Peter King's findings are based on his committee's investigation into the threat.

King plans to address the problem Wednesday during his third congressional hearing on Muslim radicalization.

Atlas has the story.
Two Florida Imams Charged with Funneling $50,000 to Pakistani Taliban

Great read from Sultan Knish

1. Anders Behring Breivik was a Fundamentalist Christian

Breivik described himself as not a religious person and mentions praying only once. His plans leading up to the attacks involved multiple visits to prostitutes. In one section of his manifesto he clarifies what he means by Christian.

Q: Do I have to believe in God or Jesus in order to become a Justiciar Knight?

no, you don’t need to have a personal relationship with God or Jesus to fight for our Christian cultural heritage. It is enough that you are a Christian-agnostic or a Christian-atheist (an atheist who wants to preserve at least the basics of the European Christian cultural legacy


Breivik did call himself a Christian, but meant that in a cultural sense, rather than a theological one. He emphasized that he was not seeking a theocracy, but a secular society. His idea of a Christian Europe had nothing to do with religion.



2. Anders Behring Breivik Hated Muslims

Breivik viewed Muslims as the enemy, but only domestically. He emphasized that; "Knights Templar do not intend to persecute devout Muslims"

And he contemplated collaborating with them on terrorist attacks against Europe. "An alliance with the Jihadists might prove beneficial to both parties... We both share one common goal." The Caliphate was a useful enemy for his cause.


In Breivik's own words, this is how such an arrangement would play out;


"They are asked to provide a biological compound manufactured by Muslim scientists in the Middle East. Hamas and several Jihadi groups have labs and they have the potential to provide such substances. Their problem is finding suitable martyrs who can pass “screenings” in Western Europe. This is where we come in. We will smuggle it in to the EU and distribute it at a target of our choosing. We must give them assurances that we are not to harm any Muslims etc."



Ask yourself is these are the words of a anti-Jihadist who was fighting against Islam. Or a delusional European terrorist who was willing to ally with Jihadist against his fellow Europeans.


Breivik spells out that he is willing to kill Europeans on behalf of just about anyone...

There might come a time when we, the PCCTS, Knights Templar will consider to use or even to work as a proxy for the enemies of our enemies.

Under these circumstances, the PCCTS, Knights Templar will for the future consider working with the enemies of the EU/US hegemony such as Iran (South Korea is unlikely), al-Qaeda, al-Shabaab or the rest of the devout fractions of the Islamic Ummah with the intention for deployment of small nuclear, radiological, biological or chemical weapons in Western European capitals and other high priority locations.

Justiciar Knights and other European Christian martyrs can avoid the scrutiny normally reserved for individuals of Arab descent and we can ensure successful deployment and detonation in the location of our choice.


This should put to rest any idea that Breivik was on a crusade against Islam. He was a deluded man who imagined himself leading a takeover of Europe, even if he had to serve as a Muslim proxy to do it.




3. Anders Behring Breivik was Inspired by Counterjihad Bloggers

Except Breivik didn't actually kill Muslims. Instead he claimed to be part of a modern Templar Knights organization that was going to take over Europe. Breivik played role playing video games obsessively. One of his favorites was Dragon Age, one of whose characters is a Templar Knight who hacks his way to power.



Did the game inspire Breivik to become a modern Templar Knight? As much as Catcher in the Rye inspired the murder of John Lennon.

Breivik was manic depressive and using steroids while obsessively acting out power fantasies. He built up a fantasy world that convinced him he could become, "...a hero of Europe... A perfect example which should be copied, applauded and celebrated. The Perfect Knight I have always strived to be."

Trying to apply rational standards to Breivik is futile. Like many killers he was of above average intelligence, but below average sanity. Remove the politics, and Breivik fits the profile of most spree killers. He was angry at society, a loner, suffered from mental problems, abused drugs (in his case steroids) and acted out violent scenarios in violent video games.

Read it all

Also be sure to read Sultan Knish article Anders Behring Breivik and the High Cost of Muslim Immigration

This is follow video to his comments made here. As I have said Cain is 100 percent right on this issue.

Andrew Bostom has this scary story of Australia accepting these elements of Sharia.
Australia: Sharia-Sanctioned Polygamy and Child Marriage

Many "conservatives" are attacking Cain on his comments supporting those that are against the building of a mosque in Murfreesboro,TN. They say this is attack on freedom of religion and the first amendment. To begin with Islam is not simply a religion it is and always has been a political system (Sharia law). Secondly has anyone who is attacking Cain for his comments took a look into who is behind the mosque in Murfreesboro? The Muslim Brotherhood has its hands all over it. If your not sure who the Brotherhood is see the video here. The Brotherhood wants to see global Islamic law ruling all the world not to mention the fact that al Qaeda came out of the Brotherhood. I feel the citizens of this town in TN have every right to be concerned about this mosque being built. Anyone who does not see good reason for legitimate concern is either naive of what Islam really is or they have not even took the time to look into the background of this mosque.
Here are a few stories about the background of this mosque.
Frank Gaffney of CSP Links Local Mosque Leaders To Sharia in Murfreesboro Hearing

ISNA Meets With US Attorney General; Assists Mufreesboro Mosque

Plaintiffs complain about mosque reading list

So much for winning the hearts and minds of Muslims in Iraq
Andrew Bostom has the story.
Post-Surge Iraq: 2010 “Worst Year” for Small Christian Minority

Comes as no surprise that Muslims are enforcing Islamic law. Since they are already calling for it.

This from Answering Muslims

AUSTRALIA--A Sydney man who was held down on his bed and whipped up to 40 times by strangers had recently converted to Islam and was reportedly being punished for drinking.

The 31-year-old was asleep in his apartment in Silverwater, in Sydney's west, when he woke to find four bearded men in his bedroom about 1am (AEST) yesterday.

Three of the intruders restrained him on the bed while the fourth man used a cable to lash him 40 times.

The attack lasted about 30 minutes and left the man covered in welts, the Seven Network reported today.

The man reportedly told police he had only recently converted to Islam and that fundamental Wahabi Muslims were punishing him for having a few drinks with friends.

Members of Sydney's Muslim community have condemned the attack.

"This criminal act has no place in Islam. As Australian Muslims we are required to follow Australian law, not take the law into our own individual hands," Ahmed Kilami, from the Muslim Village, told the Seven Network.

"I hope these guys are caught and face the full force of the law."

The victim has moved out of his home but hopes what happens to him will not distort people's view of his adopted religion, the network said.

Related video

Calls for Islamic law to rule Australia.

ISLAMIC leaders want Muslims in Australia to get interest-free loans for religious reasons.

The nation's Islamic leaders want recognition of sharia law as it applies to banking practices, according to an exclusive Herald Sun survey of imams.

There was also a call for recognition of sharia law as it applies to family law.

Should Australia recognise some aspects of sharia law? Have your say below

The survey showed some imams are sceptical that Osama bin Laden's death will be of benefit to ordinary Muslims, and they are unhappy with the way US forces disposed of his body.

The survey has also revealed:

STRONG condemnation of MPs who criticise Muslim women for wearing the burqa/nijab.

CONCERN that ordinary Muslims are still being linked to terrorism.

DISGUST that innocent people in Muslim countries are being killed in the "war on terror".

The survey was conducted in the wake of a $55,000 Federal Government training program for imams on Australian laws and values.

They have been told to preach core Australian values such as the fair go, freedom, and responsibility.
Imam Yusuf Parker, from the Alhidayah Centre in Perth, said Australia should consider recognising sharia law as it applied to finance and family law matters.

Imam Parker said Islam forbade the charging or paying of interest "so finding interest-free loans will again help Muslims to practise their Islam better".

"Other than the two major issues mentioned, I don't see other sharia law that Muslims would seek to have legally recognised," he said.

Fellow WA imam Sheik Burhaan Mehtar said sharia law often was raised to scare non-Muslims, but a dialogue would lead to better understanding.

"Islamic banking and the non-slavery of humans is a classic example. Interest is slavery," he said.

Islamic Council of Victoria board member Nazeem Hussain said legal and tax barriers currently prevented local banks from offering Islamic finance products.

"That's a massive market ... we'd encourage the Government to seek ways to tap into that market," he said.

SOURCE

This is the official sentencing of Youcef Nadarkhani who is a Christian preacher in Iran.

Thanks to Andrew Bostom:

Two Iranian Supreme Court justices have denied an appeal of Youcef Nadarkhani’s December 5, 2010 death sentence for the uniquely Islamic “crime” of apostasy. Islam stands alone amongst all modern faiths, adamantly denying its votaries freedom of conscience, as guaranteed, for example, by Article 18 of The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (“Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.”), and insisting upon lethal punishment for “public” apostates, in full accord with the Sharia.

A translation of the Iranian Supreme Court verdict makes illuminating, if depressing reading:

Issued by section 27 Supreme Court Judge Morteza Fazel and Azizoallah Razaghi

Mr. Youcef Nadarkhani, son of Byrom, 32 years old, married, born in Rasht in the state of Gilan is convicted of turning his back on Islam, the greatest religion the prophesy of Mohammad, at the age of 19.

He has often participated in Christian worship and organized home church services, evangelizing and has been baptized and baptized others, converting Muslims to Christianity. He has been accused of breaking Islamic Law that from puberty (15 years according to Islamic law) until the age of 19 the year 1996, he was raised a Muslim in a Muslim home. During court trials, he denied the prophecy of Mohammad and the authority of Islam. He has stated that he is a Christian and no longer Muslim.


During many sessions in court with the presence of his attorney and a judge, he has been sentenced to execution by hanging according to article 8 of Tahrir -olvasileh (one of Khomeni’s books about Sharia Law and Khamenie’s and Ayatollah Makarem Shirazi’s fatwa) His sentence was appealed by his attorney and sent to the supreme court.

The Supreme Courts Response

In the name of Allah
June 12, 2011

(This subpoena states):

We know that Mr. Nadarkhani has confessed that in his heart and in his actions he has denied being Muslim and converted to Christianity and has advertised and encouraged other Muslims to convert to Christianity. And because of advertising and pastoring a church repeatedly professed his Christian faith and denied the prophet Mohammad and the 12th Imam and denied the entire Koran and truth of the Koran.

His case was forwarded to the supreme court (Judge Fazel) and according to Part 2 of article 265 of the Islamic Republic Criminal Law, this case received by and must be returned the state court of Gilan Section 11, and further investigated to prove that from puberty (15 years) to 19 he was not Muslim by his acquaintances, relatives, local elders, and Muslims he frequented. He must repent his Christian faith if this is the case. No research has been done to prove this, if it can be proved that he was a practicing Muslim as an adult and has not repented, the execution will be carried out.

Signed by Morteza Fazeli and Azizollah Razagh

How sad it is for these Christians who live in the Muslim world.

Via Washington Times

Herman Cain gets it. Thanks to The Other Mccain

MINNEAPOLIS -- A group of Minneapolis-area Somalis, including some who traveled to their homeland to allegedly take up arms against the Ethiopian army, held secret meetings in 2007 to plan the trips, created fake itineraries to fool family members and challenged one another about their commitment, prosecutors contend in a court filing.

The document was filed this week in advance of a trial for one man accused of being part of the conspiracy.

It sheds new light on how the recruiting operation worked in Minneapolis and how some of the men arrived at safehouses in Somalia, where they received AK-47s and weapons training.

Since the fall of 2007, at least 21 men have left Minnesota for Somalia, where authorities believe they joined the terror group al-Shabab. Eighteen people have been charged in Minnesota in connection with the case, including Omer Abdi Mohamed, who goes on trial next week on terror-related charges.

Mohamed never traveled to Somalia, but he is accused of helping others who did. His attorney calls the allegations ridiculous.

"Omer was never involved in terrorism," said defense attorney Peter Wold. "It certainly stirs the public sentiment to suggest that, but it is not part of this case, not a part of Omer, and that will be abundantly clear."

Somalia has not had a functioning government since 1991, when warlords overthrew a socialist dictator and then turned on each other, causing chaos in the African nation of about 7 million people.

SOURCE

And Israel is supposed to negotiate with this people? How?
Gateway Pundit has all the details.
73% of Palestinians Believe Jews Should Be Killed Wherever They Hide

Dry run?

A 24-year-old Baltimore man tried to a board a flight last week with 13 knives packed in his carry-on luggage.

Amr Gamal Shedid was attempting to fly from Baltimore Washington International Airport to Minnesota on July 7 when a security officer operating an X-ray machine noticed something suspicious and discovered the 12 switchblades and a butterfly knife in the flier's luggage, according to Sgt. Kirk Perez, a spokesperson for the Maryland Transportation Authority Police. Shedid told officers that he collected knives.

SOURCE

California today became the first state to require that school districts include in their social studies lessons the contributions of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people.

“History should be honest. This bill revises existing laws that prohibit discrimination in education and ensures that the important contributions of Americans from all backgrounds and walks of life are included in our history books,” said a statement from Gov. Jerry Brown (D), who signed the bill after supporters and opponents endured more than a week of suspense.

The bill, S.B. 48, which passed in the legislature on a mostly party-line vote, drew sharp opposition from some religious groups, who raised concerns that schools were promoting what they call an immoral lifestyle and impinging on parental rights to teach their children about sexual issues.

But supporters hail the law as a breakthrough that will give children a more complete view of history and society – and make California students safer.

SOURCE

The Blaze has this story of campaign for Sharia law being enforced in the UK.
‘You Are Entering a Shariah Controlled Zone’: UK Group to Wage Islamic Law Campaign

Great article by Walid Shoebat

THE REAL WAR

It’s a myth to think that there is a struggle between “moderate” and “extremist” Muslims going on in the Middle East; the war is between nationalists that love their national heritage and Muslim Universalists who attach themselves to Sharia. The use “moderate” implies that Islam can be moderated or is moderate. It’s not.



The problem is that we have not defined Islam’s views—that is—a war on capitalism, nationalism Jews/Israel/Zionism and Trinitarians. This is the core of Islam’s war throughout history. All four schools of Sunni Islamic thought: Hanafi, Hanbali, Shafii and Maliki espouse Islam as a political Universalist Jihadi movement. Ijtihad, the idea of freethinking is restricted and confined within the laws of Shariah.



REFORMATION STARTS BY CONFESSION

Let’s first take Dr. Zudi Jasser, a self-described reformist who honestly does reject violence. Yet, it is clear that Jasser also rejects the idea that Muhammad or even Islam’s founders have exercised violence as the sunnah/hadith clearly describes.



Westerners look at the first, while they ignore the second.



Jasser promotes Muslim scholars to back his idea that Islam can be reformed. Yet even such reformers confess that Muhammad used force. Take Muhammad Said Ashmawi whom Jasser promotes as one of the greatest examples, he states “Arabs did not enter into Islam submitting and obeying as the Quran says, but they came as a result of the prophet’s control and rule over them by the Muhajiroun and Ansar. So their view of governance came from Muhammad ‘governed by a governor’, followers of a master and a king. This created a dangerous scenario on how to define the Caliphate.” (Al-Khilafa, M.S Al-Ashmawi, Pp 54.)



You cannot deal with Islam unless you deny the authority of the Quran and Muhammad, which Jasser isn’t prepared to do which Ashmawi does.



TAHREEF

There is only one option left for the reformists, even Ashmawi had to resort to the Hadith having succumbed to Tahreef (textual corruption) (Pp.77, 78), which is like saying to devout Christians that the New Testament has been modified with insertions regarding the Kingdom of Christ, the hope of every devout Christian. If Muslims follow this, there is no hope left in keeping the faith. Islam is a Mohammedan religion just as Christianity is Christ’s. Removing Muhammad from the equation is as removing Christ from Christianity.



A great example when speaking of Islam is Mormonism. Mormons by large moderated in the U.S., its original faith was similar to Islam—warfare, concubines, execution of apostates…but it did not moderate of its own free will. It was defeated after the Utah War and the Mountain Meadow Massacre committed by Brigham Young. It was Mormonism’s presence under President James Buchanan and the influence of Christianity that suppressed their movement and influenced it and toned it down. It was through textual changes and much abrogation.



ABROGATION—JASSERS’ DILEMMA

While Jasser calls for allegorizing the Quran he follows the strict literal ruling that alcohol is forbidden, by this he exercises a literal interpretation alongside the laws of Islamic abrogation since consuming alcohol was permitted in the first parts of the Quran. So if we take his model, the peaceful verses also can be abrogated which is the reason we have terrorism.



ASHMAWI’S REFORMATION—THE CHRISTIAN MODEL

Jasser uses Ashmawi as one of his favorite examples of moderation of Islam. Yet Ashmawi describes the intent of the caliphate, which was to build a spiritual entity like Christianity (Jesus to Peter). He uses the Christian model. However, if the Muslim nation was “the best of all nations” and Islam was “the superior, pure, uncorrupted and unadulterated word of God” this solution would reverse the equation that stems from a confession by Ashmawi, that Christianity had it right and Islam didn’t since Muhammad according to reformists never intended a successor. (P.p 104)



Ashmawi compares Christianity’s vicar (Khalifa) to the spiritual-religious affairs while Islam’s Caliph is definitely in charge of civil affairs (P.p 105)



Jasser is to be commended for his stand against the Muslim Brotherhood-umbrella like CAIR, ISNA and others, however his organization only has 1500 members with only 13% being Muslim, yet he stated on the Dennis Prager show that 70% of all Muslims follow his style of Islam. Where did he get these numbers?



THE ALIENATION ISSUE

In my view, there is no real significant evidence of reformation within Islam; Jasser gives a false sense of hope. Reformation begins with theologians’ not medical doctors. We have no religious manuals in Islam that fits Jasser’s views.



Even Sufi Muslims who are touted to be moderate are Mahdists and if a Mahdi arrives we will have a fuehrer whose objective is to destroy the Jews and Christians. Jasser’s model creates a war on freedom since according to Jasser: “The problem comes when ill-advised trainers (like me and other “islamaphobes”) ‘equate political Islam and Sharia with Islam itself’”. This only serves to silence critics. As Zudi proclaimed: “They [critics of Islam] cannot be on the frontlines in an ideological battle being waged, which demonizes the morality of the faith of Islam and its founder, the Prophet Mohammed.”



You cannot have it both ways since as what Jasser says here would be extreme and is the same argument made by CAIR and their ilk that only serve an “alienation agenda”. Should Jasser as a medical doctor not alienate smokers? After all, according to doctors smoking kills. What about “moderate” smokers?



“Moderate” Muslims believe in Shariah as well and the “strategy” should never supersede freedom. As Jasser claims “Most should understand that strategically, identifying ‘Islam as the problem,’ immediately alienates upwards of one quarter of the world’s population.”



What about alienating Christians? Fear of alienation never serves the truth, as the truth is almost always offensive. When Muslims curse the Trinity, are Christians not being alienated? Muslims that are “alienated” suffer from a condition called intolerance.



The fear of alienation is destructive. Hinduism with its reincarnation if fully believed is destructive since a baboon becomes someone’s uncle. Do I alienate the Hindu by teaching him to remove baboons? Sati, the Hindu practice of burning widows was abolished thanks to Christians like William Carey and William Wilberforce. Did these righteous Christians alienate India? No, they saved women. Did they do it by respecting Hinduism? Hinduism had its own ‘Shariah’ that needed to be defeated. It was the love of God and biblical ethics that helped save women.



Islam hates the Trinity and according to Christian biblical theology, this is Antichrist (1 John 2:22). This definitely demonizes Islam, which is the core writings of my critics. But is their label of racism valid? Hardly, no matter how many times they beat their drums.



Jasser’s argument presents a dilemma; he is against using the word “Islam” when countering Islamists. But this is an impossibility since everyone who objects on us using “Islam” instead of “Islamism” are caught slipping, Jasser himself states: “Political Islam has a viral recurrence in the form of an infection, which needs a Muslim counter-jihad in order to purge it.” Islam is political, so to say “political Islam” instead of Islam is ridiculous and only proves useful as a ploy not to sound too “right wing.”



When does a strategy supersede truth? When does the end justify the means? Moderates are not defined by denouncing violent Jihad or the subjugation of women. Moderates are the ones that denounce Shariah with all its civil aspects—inheritance and marriage laws included. Can a woman inherit equal portions of a man in Islamic Sharia? Can marriage between Muslim women with non-Muslim be acceptable? Should a pastor be able to purchase a mosque in order to convert its use as a church?



Is Jasser willing to condemn Shariah? If so, how can he then face moderate Muslims that believe in it? Which means that they are not moderate, how then can they justify believing in Shariah? Is the Northern Alliance of Afghanistan moderate? How so when they call for the killing Islamic converts to Christianity.



Such efforts simply create false hope based on a false premise. The problem is the literal interpretation of the Quran. The solution according to Jasser is to introduce a un-literal interpretation. The fact is; we only have few choices. If Capitalism is considered an “extreme” solution to Communism then socialism is the answer. But is it? Can we promote an oxymoron—“communistic capitalism”?



When it comes to Islam what we need is “Oxyclean” and not an oxymoron. Reformation of Islam is impossible since no one with common sense could espouse to reform Communism or Nazism. Can we change Islamic inheritance laws without defeating Islam first? Will we succeed in allowing a glass of wine and pork chop to be eaten in Mecca without first defeating Islam? Will Zuhdi allow a Christian boy to marry a Muslim girl or allow a non-Muslim marry his daughter?



What will the return on investment be on the likes of Jasser? Jasser has very few followers while the Bible won two thirds of Africa, which less than fifty years ago was two thirds Muslim.



It is a myth to say that Christendom gained peace by allegorizing the Bible. The fact is that a Christian literalist is peaceful. No one can explain the Quran by avoiding the literal Hadith. No one can reverse the Quran—its Medina violent verses are its New Testament and the Meccan is it’s abrogated the old. Neither is self-deception viable since reformation and Ijtihad have limitations.



No, the Christian who denounces Islam does not do as Jasser suggests: “dismiss our most powerful weapon against the militant Islamists—the mantle of religion and the pulpit of moderate Muslims who can retake our faith from the Islamists”. When Jasser says: “we need to retake our religion” this falls under the myth that Islam was hijacked. When was it hijacked? Was it hijacked when Jews were exiled out of Arabia at time of Mohammad the Prophet of Islam?



Even when this issue of the massacre and the exile of the Jews from Saudi Arabia was brought up in a debate with Jasser, he simply denied it: “its impossible for a prophet to commit such a thing” he said, despite this being well documented in the Hadith of Al Bukari. So Dr. Jasser transforms from being a Jihadist to becoming a holocaust denier, and makes excuses for the violence of the Prophet Mohammad.



Its difficult to deny the bloody wars committed in the name of Allah when Omar ransacked Judea. If in doubt, read the works of Sophronius. Must Christians abandon history in order to reform a cult? Can a Muslim denounce Khalid bin Al-Waleed’s blood thirst on Persians after the coagulating of their blood clogged a ravine? Will Dr. Jasser denounce Tareq bin Ziad cooking Christians in Caldrons in Spain? Will he denounce Ali’s cry that “we are a people who drink blood out of the goblets of the skulls of our enemies”? Will he denounce the drinking of the blood of Muhammad by his companions as it dripped from his shield? Will he denounce Muhammad’s cry that “the trees and the stones will cry out there is a Jew hiding behind me”? Can Muslims cry out for the blood of the Martyrs of Cordova as much as Christians continually confess murders done by the Crusades?



The answer is yes, but this comes only through confession, which is the habit of Christians and Jews.



Deceivers are not only defined when evil men intentionally lie to destroy what is good, but also by well intentioned individuals who undermine what is obviously evil.

People have no concept of freedom of speech.


More on this at Rebel Pundit

These are free books that can be downloaded or viewed online about Islam. Some are written by non-Muslims others are written by Muslims to teach fellow Muslims about Islam.



Islam 101
This is a a great read on Islam. It gives you the basic overview of what Islam is and what the basic beliefs are.

The Little Green Book
This book written by Irans Ayatoallah Khomeini on his rulings and views on Islam.

Prophet Of Doom
A book about Islam and its prophet Muhammad

Sharia Law For Non-Muslims
Very important book on what Sharia law is from Islamic texts.

The Two Hour Koran
A 84 page book on what the Koran is and what it teaches.

The Islamic Doctrine Of Women
Learn what Islam teaches about women and their rights.

The Life of Muhammad
Learn about the life of the prophet of Islam Muhammad.

Islam And Human Rights
Read about how Islam views the rights of humans.

Twenty Three Years
A book that looks at the life and times of Islams founder Muhammad.

Sirat Rasoul Allah
The earliest written biography on Muhammad.

Behind The Veil
A very in depth study of Islam.

THE CODIFICATION OF THE QUR'AN TEXT
This details how the Quran was recorded and how it was preserved.

‘Umdat al-Salik’ (Reliance of the Traveller)
This is one of the first manuals ever written on Islamic Sharia law. This books was written by a Muslim and can be purchased in virtually and Islamic book store even in America.

ISLAM EVIL IN THE NAME OF GOD
A huge 980 page book on Islam by Jake Neuman

Here is another ruling by Abrar Mirza not mentioned in the video.
Abrar Mirza ruling on divorcing a little girl: http://www.askimam.org/fatwa/fatwa.php?askid=6ed769e5adc6a5e80e64e0f6a5139be6


Here are my sources for information:

Darul Hakimah Academy
http://darulhikmah.com/courses/weekend/teachers/

Abrar Mirzas Sharia rulings
http://www.askimam.org/fatwa/fatwa.php?askid=6ed769e5adc6a5e80e64e0f6a5139be6

http://www.askimam.org/fatwa/fatwa.php?askid=f29feb56a3ca8b869292f4d3f970d905

http://www.askimam.org/fatwa/fatwa.php?askid=75c09b622d161ddc35ee6af8fa59dffb

http://www.askimam.org/fatwa/fatwa.php?askid=55ba989e9baf414188efd057aa671e60

http://www.askimam.org/fata/fatwa.php?askid=1b4a73b692a0e1332b76871544305746

http://www.askimam.org/fatwa/fatwa.php?askid=4d81cbb08b27a0cf5c0ef2c3c1f5e025

http://www.askimam.org/fatwa/fatwa.php?askid=e9a95bd993fb98edaf0515e35d209d74

http://www.askimam.org/fatwa/fatwa.php?askid=04325461834415b5253fbfcc49febc0a

http://www.askimam.org/fatwa/fatwa.php?askid=04225a4e70dd4cd94a9da3fbf2d2b511

http://www.askimam.org/fatwa/fatwa.php?askid=8f7f3f8947352184f57a5ed80700eb59

http://www.askimam.org/fatwa/fatwa.php?askid=dfc6b4b10d78c120a2caea4dd95f2018

http://www.askimam.org/fatwa/fatwa.php?askid=b9138e6f107ad6f55eceaba3e4d2f562

Atlas has the whole story:
Law Enforcement Finally Admits Hezb'Allah is Operating in Mexico

In this clip he admits that the cutting off the hands of thieves and the stoning of those that commit adultery. He is just simply saying it is "insignificant." Im pretty sure most people would disagree with that. He goes on to say that this type of "capital punishment" is not applicable in America. Well that's only because Sharia has not be implemented.



While Im at it here is Sayyid Hassan Al-Qazwini at the Islamic Center Of America. In this clip you will hear him talk about what conditions have to be met before Islamic Sharia law can be put in place. You can clearly tell is it not opposed to the types of laws like in Iran. It is just simply that certain conditions have to be met before Sharia can be instituted.